How economists can help in litigation involving personal injury, death, or discrimination: Comment
$25.00v2i1: pp. 91-96 Michael J Piette; Charles T Haworth Personal Injury and wrongful death| Fringe Benefits 1992
Showing the single result
Showing the single result
v2i1: pp. 91-96 Michael J Piette; Charles T Haworth Personal Injury and wrongful death| Fringe Benefits 1992
Estimating decedents' consumption expenditures in wrongful death actions: Some refinements
1 × $25.00 Regression analysis in litigation: Some overlooked considerations
1 × $25.00 Full Journal of Legal Economics Volume 16 Issue 1
1 × $75.00 Justifying utilization of the total offset method: An opposing comment
1 × $25.00 Tax filing status change and economic loss in cases of wrongful death
1 × $25.00 Economics and antitrust litigation
1 × $25.00 The Reduction for Decedent Self-Consumption: Jurisdictional Mandates for Personal Consumption or Personal Maintenance
1 × $25.00 Taxes and the present value assessment of economic losses in personal injury litigation: Comment
1 × $25.00 Medicare Set Asides
1 × $25.00 Employee Misclassification and Related Damages Claims
1 × $25.00 Full Journal of Legal Economics Volume 13 Issue 3
1 × $75.00 Book Review: Medical Malpractice Litigation
1 × $25.00 Editors’ Note: Change of Editor
1 × $0.00 A nontrivial (though seemingly not uncommon) error in calculating the discount rate used to reduce future losses to present value
1 × $25.00 The application of hedonic models to personal Injury litigation: Comment
1 × $25.00 U.S. supreme court's decision in Business Electronics v. Sharp: A victory for vertical price fixing
1 × $25.00 Subtotal: $475.00